Stories of Hope: Father-Son
Relationships
by Christiane Bongartz
Survival and solutions to the impossible-a child can
bring these about. This is the message in two books at
whose center we find a father-son relationship with
inverted roles—Russell Hoban’s The Mouse and His
Child and Salman Rushdie’s Haroun and the Sea of
Stories. It is the sons and their dreams for a
better future that inspire the momentum necessary to
make that future happen, even in the most adverse of
circumstances, even in the face of parental despair.
The Mouse and His Child
(Harper & Row, 1967) and Haroun and the Sea of
Stories (Granta Books/ Viking, 1990) were written a
good twenty years apart, yet they explore their common
theme with striking parallels. Both are narratives of
authenticity and intuition. In The Mouse and His
Child, the young protagonist is a wind-up toy
without a name, entirely dependent on others to move
around in endless circles. He is literally tied with
interlocking hands to his father, also a mechanical toy,
and they dance their circles together without
self-motivation or aim. But the child has a dream, a
dream to have a family, a dream that can only come true
if they become selfwinding and free. This dream is what
sees him and his father through countless adventures,
including the capture by a rat in charge of a syndicate
and philosophical dialogue with a C. Serpentina, a
snapping turtle famous for his dedication to pure
thought. As such, the turtle’s musings fail to show the
way to freedom. With father and son helplessly trapped
under water in a dull world of twilight, it is
solidarity from friends that is required to get change
under way.
Waters in Haroun are not
dull, but troubled. The sea of stories is about to be
poisoned by the enemy, Khattam- Shud, whose name
actually means “The End.” Unlike the mouse father, whose
despair results in part from his inability to make his
son’s dreams come true, Haroun’s father finds himself
trapped in despair over his own life. He has lost his
wife to another man, and he has lost his story-telling
abilities. Darkness clouds his mind, and darkness is
also threatening to take over the world of stories and
with it all of human life. Haroun must confront the
enemy and remove the split between light and darkness,
between speech and silence, dividing the world he visits
and troubling those he loves in his own world.
Both Haroun and the mouse
child see their dreams come true because of their
persistence and faith, and that faith makes their worlds
whole. This, in turn, brings about healing in the
parent, so that with dream fulfillment they also receive
a restored and reformed relationship with their fathers.
Remarkable about both tales is how they are told, how
the big themes are couched in light and flowing
language. Word games, rhymes, songs, and verbal jokes
shape this linguistic lightness. Language playfully acts
as a counter theme to the seriousness of circumstance.
In Haroun, we find place names that are letters of the
alphabet (the Town of G, the Valley of K), which causes
confusion for mail delivery. In The Mouse and His
Child, crows stage their own play, “The Last Visible
Dog.” Haroun and the mouse child let us experience these
elements of the strange through their eyes-as part of
their story. They must take in the strangeness with the
freedom of staying bemusedly and amusedly aloof.
Learning the hard things about life, then, is not always
a hard experience. There are many sides to experience,
and keeping the faith sustains both the children and
their troubled fathers.
A strength found in both
books is that the difficult isn’t hidden or too easily
overcome. Both are tales of complexity and political
acuity. In our times of uncertainty in a linguistic
universe that includes terror alerts, both books are
timely reading and inspirational both to young readers
and perhaps even more so to their adult friends and
relatives.
A
native of Germany, Christiane Bongartz teaches
linguistics at the University of North
Carolina-Charlotte.